Before the number
A quote without understanding the problem is just a rate.
Two companies can sell the same thing and operate very differently. Branches, approvals, credit, inventory and exceptions change the real work.
First we understand where your operation gets complicated. Then we define what Metrify should solve and what it takes to do it well.
Scope-based proposal. No additional charge per user.
Before the number
Two companies can sell the same thing and operate very differently. Branches, approvals, credit, inventory and exceptions change the real work.
Three conversations
You do not need an 80-page requirements document. We need to see how the company works when things get interesting.
01 · Where it gets stuck
Inventory, sales, credit, branches, metrics, permissions or manual work.
02 · What Metrify must know
Rules, catalogs, relationships and context unique to the operation.
03 · What we implement first
A first stage that makes operational and economic sense.
Growth should not punish you
Metrify does not add cost for each new user. We want the system used wherever the work happens.
What actually moves the price
What moves the quote is what Metrify needs to configure, connect and support so the operation is represented correctly from day one.
More operating points mean more context, permissions, inventory and shared rules.
Credit, approvals, returns, purchasing and tax flows can vary widely.
Catalogs, rules, targets, users and structures we need to configure before launch.
Migration, guidance and adoption so the ERP does not become another abandoned project.
The proposal
The quote should say what problem is in scope, what is not, how we start and what comes next.
Processes and modules in the first stage.
Rules and structures to be modeled.
How we move from today to Metrify.
What can grow later without rebuilding the foundation.
Our position
Metrify competes best when it understands a complex operation, not when it wins a 200-feature checklist.
No per-user pricing
More people using the system should not be a problem.
In stages
Solve what matters first and reduce noise and risk.
With context
The proposal starts from how your company works, not a generic package.
No pretending
If Metrify is not the right fit, we want to find that out early too.
No fine print
Short answers to questions that actually matter.
It depends on scope, branches, configuration and implementation. That is why the first conversation is about the operation before the number.
No additional charge per user. Pricing focuses on scope and implementation complexity.
No. We prefer a first stage that solves real problems and can grow later.
Yes. The first conversation is also a fit check for both sides.
Bring the spreadsheet, exception or process that still depends on calls, memory or repeated data entry. Start there.